Schattdecor
67 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Germany 1
15.02.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 2
11.07.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 3
17.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 4
05.08.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 5
26.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 6
09.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 7
10.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 8
07.01.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 9
02.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
15.08.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 11
09.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 12
24.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. First class salary. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 13
27.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. First class salary. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 14
12.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 15
03.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 16
01.08.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Milano 17
15.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Rohrdorf 18
25.01.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Excellent activity. High payments. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Rohrdorf 19
01.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Rohrdorf 20
01.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Rohrdorf 21
12.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Rohrdorf 22
13.09.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Rohrdorf 23
12.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Rohrdorf 24
19.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Employers with criticisms.
Rohrdorf 25
21.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Rosenheim 26
03.12.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Rosenheim 27
04.12.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Rosenheim 28
02.11.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. High payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Rosenheim 29
19.03.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Rosenheim 30
04.05.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Rosenheim 31
17.05.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Good future prospects. Excellent employer.
Rosenheim 32
06.08.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. First class salary. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Rosenheim 33
24.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Reasonable job provider.
Rosenheim 34
21.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Rosenheim 35
31.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Rosenheim 36
01.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Reasonable job provider.
Rosenheim 37
08.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Rosenheim 38
30.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Rosenheim 39
06.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Useful management. Acceptable service. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Rosenheim 40
25.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Employers with criticisms.
Rosenheim 41
27.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Employers with criticisms.
Rosenheim 42
22.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Thansau 43
21.06.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Fair payments. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 44
21.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 45
21.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 46
08.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 47
21.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Fair payments. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Thansau 48
09.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 49
26.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 50
05.11.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 51
07.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Thansau 52
21.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 53
07.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Thansau 54
30.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Excellent activity. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Satisfactory employment site.
Thansau 55
09.02.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Interesting tasks. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Recommendable workplace.
Thansau 56
22.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Excellent activity. First class salary. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Thansau 57
12.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 58
07.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Reasonable job provider.
Thansau 59
04.04.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Thansau 60
01.02.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Thansau 61
18.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 62
27.11.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Beneficial career. Reasonable job provider.
Thansau 63
27.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Thansau 64
07.08.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 65
05.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Fair payments. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Thansau 66
23.06.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Thansau 67
06.12.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
